Smoking Bans: Prohibition Revisited
Joseph L. Bast (email@example.com) is president of The Heartland Institute. The following letter was sent to The Los Angeles Times on March 24, 2006
Jane Engle's article about the spread of smoking bans ["Smoking bans gain worldwide favor, including at Disneyland hotels," March 19] was misleading in two ways. First, it made no mention of the thousands of proposed smoking bans that have been defeated by concerned citizens who see them as unnecessary violations of individual freedom and private property rights. Second, it did not mention the hundreds of millions of dollars being spent by the anti-smoking movement to demonize smokers and tobacco products.
Smoking bans are not just appearing spontaneously, the result of people suddenly deciding that smoking is unhealthy or that second-hand smoke is a danger to nonsmokers. They are the outcome of a deliberate campaign to shape public opinion by exaggerating health threats and ignoring values such as self-responsibility and privacy.
There is nothing inevitable about the spread of smoking bans, and it is entirely likely that we will look back on the recent spate of bans with guilt and remorse, just as alcohol Prohibition is now viewed as having been a deadly mistake.
Joseph L. Bast