Net Neutrality III is Huge Government Heinous

Net Neutrality III is Huge Government Heinous
May 6, 2014

Seton Motley

Seton Motley is the president of Less Government, a DC-based non-profit organization dedicated to... (read full bio)

The Barack Obama Administration is back at it — yet another big government power grab is in the works.

The Administration’s Federal Communications Commission (FCC) again resurrecting Network Neutrality — an all-encompassing Internet usurpation twice unanimously killed by court as an illegal overreach.

Court Backs Comcast Over FCC on ‘Net Neutrality’

Verizon Wins Net Neutrality Court Ruling Against FCC

Net Neutrality III does in fact acknowledge and allow for a basic economic precept: If you use more, you pay more.

It will allow Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to charge bandwidth hogs like Netflix and Google (owner of YouTube) for the Web-exploding bandwidth they use:

Netflix and YouTube Make Up Majority of US Internet Traffic

Netflix Now The Largest Single Source of Internet Traffic In North America 

Video Viewing on Netflix Accounts for Up to 30 Percent of Online Traffic

Right now,  all of us — including non-Netflix and non-YouTube users — subsidize their massive profit-models. Changing this, of course, upsets them.

Google And Netflix Are Considering An All-Out PR Blitz Against The FCC’s Net Neutrality Plan

Shocker.

This nod to economic reality also has the left rending garments and gnashing teeth in overwrought, overdramatic fashion.

Barack Macbeth’s ‘Murder’ of Net Neutrality 

So This is How Net Neutrality Dies, Under a Democratic President

Thanks to the FCC Net Neutrality is Dead 

Stop the FCC from Breaking the Internet

If these leftist bad actors had their way, the government would mandate that gas stations charge the same price for empty Escalades and Escorts.

Their reaction is part knee-jerk response to anything less than total government command-and-control, and part political theater.  Their screeching — combined with our reasonable objection to this third attempt at massive government overreach — allows FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler to say, See — both sides are angry with me.  My proposal must be reasonable.

Hardly.  The Chairman has circulated amongst the Commission his Net Neutrality Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) – the first step in a process that so often ends in really bad policy.  I spoke — on condition of anonymity — with someone inside the Beast.  And the first draft ain’t good.

A caveat: This is a first draft.  The final version, once the four Commissioners weigh in, may end up looking dramatically different.  But this is Chairman Wheeler left to his own devices — and it ain’t good.

The proposal possesses two over-arching characteristics.

  1. A preemptive Mother-May-I approach to Internet innovation. Anytime the marketplace develops a new way of doing just about anything, the innovators must first check with the government to see if they can implement it. Fairly command-and-control, is it not?  Not exactly a great way to run a constantly evolving, endlessly-faceted World Wide Web.
  2. A nebulousness to exactly just how far the government’s regulatory reach is.  Just what nook or cranny of the private Web — if any — lies beyond the Leviathan’s tentacles?

The order’s lynchpin is how the government will now define “high speed broadband.”  It appears to mandate that everyone must be able to simultaneously download multiple movies while watching Game of Thrones and playing Call of Duty with everyone from their graduating class.

And if that ridiculously huge bandwidth demand slows you down ever so slightly — the government won’t consider it “high speed.”

See, the actual law — which the FCC is ignoring by imposing Net Neutrality — allows the government to stick it’s enormous proboscis even further into the Web if there is “market failure.”  So the government will absurdly define market “success” — and then claim it’s failing.  Then start ratcheting up the regulations.

Remember Obamacare’s nutritional information disclosure requirements? Obamacare Requires 34 Million Pizza Nutrition Signs 

The new Net Neutrality order dramatically ramps up the disclosure requirements for ISPs.  How?  In what forms and fashions?  Again, it’s nebulous — and open-ended.  If Obamacare’s multi-million menu amendments are anything like a precedent, it isn’t good.

What are the punishments for violating these absurd new regulations? Again — nebulous. And, again — the government’s omni-directional precedents aren’t good.

Uninsured Next Year? Here’s Your Obamacare Penalty 

Small Businesses Could Be Hit With Huge Obamacare Fines

Obamacare Springs New, Expensive Contractor Misclassification Penalty

Obamacare to Hit Smokers with Huge Penalties

Obamacare Work Disincentives Will Add $200 Billion To Cost 

Think this latest version of Web-sector-choking Net Neutrality won’t provide similarly costly disincentives?

That ain’t nebulous.


[Originally published at Daily Caller]

Seton Motley

Seton Motley is the president of Less Government, a DC-based non-profit organization dedicated to... (read full bio)