President Barack Obama wants to double the U.S. quota subscription in the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to $130 billion  from its current $65 billion. This is the foreign aid organization that has been busy bailing out Greece, Portugal, and Ireland with $86.6 billion.
U.S. taxpayers have been responsible for about 20 percent of those bailouts, or approximately $17 billion so far, even as the Eurozone continues to crumble and the debt crisis spreads to Italy and Spain.
Obama’s call to double down came after former Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner had sworn under oath to the House Financial Services Committee in 2012 that  “we have no intention to seek additional U.S. resources for the IMF.”
The IMF, with U.S. support, in 2010 had voted to double the current quota subscriptions to the IMF . Passage required 85 percent of the IMF’s executive board to approve any increase of quotas, and the United States has 16.75 percent of the vote, giving the U.S. an effective veto over any change.
The vote, however, achieved a 95.32 percent majority. Such a vote would have been impossible without U.S. support.
As reported by the Washington Post on March 5 a Treasury spokesperson admitted , “The United States is committed to implementing the 2010 quota and governance reform. We are actively working with Congress to get quota legislation completed as soon as possible.”
The increased quota would replace part of the nation’s current $100 billion line of credit to the IMF created in 2009 by the Pelosi-Reid Congress, keeping the total U.S. stake in the IMF at $165 billion.
The difference is that whereas the credit line can be tapped when needed—so far about $12.9 billion has been used of the $100 billion of so-called New Arrangements to Borrow —the quota moneys are given to the IMF up front and are irredeemable.
That means, should Greece or the other European basket cases default on loans from the quota, we’ll never get repaid. Whereas if they default on the New Arrangements to Borrow , then the IMF will be on the hook to pay us back. That suggests the most recent push could be to defend the agency against insolvency should the worst happen.
This new obligation is being touted while Obama claims an $85 billion reduction of budget authority in the sequester would be disastrous.
Still Not Enough
Meanwhile, even with the new quotas the IMF would not have enough money to prop up the real problem countries in Europe: Italy and Spain.
IMF managing director Christine Lagarde in a speech in Berlin in Jan. 2012 warned , “we need a larger firewall. Without it, countries like Italy and Spain, that are fundamentally able to repay their debts, could potentially be forced into a solvency crisis by abnormal financing costs.”
But she was not referring to the IMF. There she was arguing for the European Stability Mechanism and European Central Bank efforts to be expanded to prop up Italy and Spain.
Of course, that is not stopping more than 130 academics and government officials from claiming in a letter to House Speaker John Boehner  (R-OH) that expanding the IMF quotas will somehow alleviate “uncertainty in Europe.”
However, even if the quota increases are approved all over the world, the IMF’s total capacity is only $1.36 trillion . The combined debts of Italy and Spain alone are €2.7 trillion, or $3.3 trillion.
The IMF could not bail them out if it wanted to.
Even the European Central Bank holds only €142.7 billion , or $185 billion, of Italian and Spanish bonds, according to its most recent release of its bond-buying program.